Atlas of Creation -- 生きた化石は進化論の反証
欧州評議会でも話題のHarun Yahyaの豪華な本"Atlas of Creation"をながめてみた。全3巻(800頁＋759頁＋831頁＝2390頁)とすごい量で、ほぼフルカラー。カラープリンタに出力するよりも、買った方が安いくらい。
目次だけでも、すごいことになっている：
Atlas of Creation Vol.1
INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
1. WHAT IS A FOSSIL? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2. FOSSIL SPECIMENS DISCOVERED IN NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA . . . .44
Fossil Specimens Discovered in the USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Fossil Specimens Found in Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .184
Fossil Specimens Found in the Dominican Republic. . . . . . . . 220
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Peru . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Argentina . . . . . . . . . . . .338
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Chile . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
3. FOSSIL SPECIMENS DISCOVERED IN EUROPE . . . . . . . . . . . .350
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . .352
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Spain . . . . . . . . . . . . . .380
Fossil Specimens Discovered in the Czech Republic . . . . . . . 381
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . .386
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Great Britain . . . . . . . . . .398
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417
4. FOSSIL SPECIMENS DISCOVERED IN AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST. . 442
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Morocco. . . . . . . . . . . . . 444
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Lebanon . . . . . . . . . . . . .464
Fossils Specimens Discovered in Madagascar. . . . . . . . . . . 488
5. FOSSIL SPECIMENS DISCOVERED IN CHINA, AUSTRALIA AND
NEW ZEALAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .506
Fossil Specimens Discovered in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . .508
Fossil Specimens Discovered in New Zealand . . . . . . . . . . .568
Fossil Specimens Discovered in Australia. . . . . . . . . . . . 569
6. FOSSIL SKULLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .574
BLOW FROM FOSSIL SKULLS TO DARWINISM . . . . . . . . . . . . . .576
CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .610
APPENDIX
THE COLLAPSE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . 614
THE REAL IDEOLOGICAL ROOT OF TERRORISM:
DARWINISM AND MATERIALISM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 616
INTRODUCTION: WHY THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION? . . . . . . . . . . .626
FOREWORD: A GREAT MIRACLE OF OUR TIMES:
BELIEF IN THE EVOLUTION DECEIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .628
CHAPTER 1 TO BE FREED FROM PREJUDICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . .630
CHAPTER 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE THEORY . . . . . . . . . . . . 634
CHAPTER 3 IMAGINARY MECHANISMS OF EVOLUTION . . . . . . . . . . 642
CHAPTER 4 THE FOSSIL RECORD REFUTES EVOLUTION . . . . . . . . . 647
CHAPTER 5 TALE OF TRANSITION FROM WATER TO LAND . . . . . . . . 652
CHAPTER 6 THE IMAGINARY EVOLUTION OF BIRDS AND MAMMALS . . . . .656
CHAPTER 7 EVOLUTIONISTS’ BIASED, DECEPTIVE
INTERPRETATIONS OF FOSSILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .666
CHAPTER 8 EVOLUTION FORGERIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 668
CHAPTER 9 THE SCENARIO OF HUMAN EVOLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . 671
CHAPTER 10 THE MOLECULAR IMPASSE OF EVOLUTION . . . . . . . . . 691
Thermodynamics Falsifies Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .716
CHAPTER 11 DESIGN CANNOT BE ACCOUNTED FOR BY COINCIDENCE . . . .720
CHAPTER 12 WHY EVOLUTIONIST CLAIMS ARE INVALID . . . . . . . . .728
CHAPTER 13 THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION: A MATERIALISTIC LIABILITY . 741
CHAPTER 14 MEDIA: AN OXYGEN TENT FORTHE THEORY OF EVOLUTION . . 746
CHAPTER 15 CONCLUSION: EVOLUTION IS A DECEIT . . . . . . . . . .750
CHAPTER 16 THE FACT OF CREATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 754
CHAPTER 17 THE SECRET BEYOND MATTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 768
CHAPTER 18 RELATIVITY OF TIME AND THE REALITY OF FATE . . . . . 791
Atlas of Creation Vol.2
FOSSIL RECORDS REFUTE EVOLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
DARWIN WAS MISTAKEN: SPECIES HAVE NEVER CHANGED . . . . . . . . .18
THE CLAIM OF INTERMEDIATE-FORM FOSSILS IS A DECEPTION . . . . . .22
THE FOSSIL RECORD VERIFIES CREATION:
Stasis in the Fossil Record . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
THE COELACANTH SILENCED THE SPECULATION
CONCERNING FOSSILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48
THE STARTING POINT OF PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM . . . . . . . . . . 56
CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF LAND-ANIMALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF SEA CREATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF BIRDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF PLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .192
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF INSECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
A HISTORICAL LIE: THE STONE AGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480
FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .482
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .484
CIVILIZATIONS RETREAT AS WELL AS ADVANCE . . . . . . . . . . . .497
ASTONISHING REMAINS OF ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS . . . . . . . . . .526
THE TRUE RELIGION HAS EXISTED SINCE THE BEGINNING OF HISTORY . .578
CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .584
DARWINISM REFUTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590
FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .592
A SHORT HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593
THE MECHANISMS OF DARWINISM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 598
TRUE NATURAL HISTORY - I (FROM INVERTEBRATES TO REPTILES) . . . 607
TRUE NATURAL HISTORY - II (BIRDS AND MAMMALS) . . . . . . . . . 630
THE ORIGIN OF MAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND THE ORIGIN OF LIFE . . . . . . . . . . . .688
THE MYTH OF HOMOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .708
IMMUNITY, "VESTIGIAL ORGANS" AND EMBRYOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . 718
THE ORIGIN OF PLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .725
IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .733
INFORMATION THEORY AND THE END OF MATERIALISM . . . . . . . . . 746
DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN SCIENCE AND MATERIALISM . . . . . . . . .749
CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .753
Altas of Creation Vol.3
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
EVOLUTIONISTS' INTERMEDIATE-FORM DILEMMA . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
CAMBRIAN FOSSILS AND THE CREATION OF SPECIES . . . . . . . . . . 17
"MISSING LINK DISCOVERED" HEADLINES ARE AN
UNSCIENTIFIC DECEPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
DARWIN'S ILLOGICAL AND UNSCIENTIFIC FORMULA . . . . . . . . . . .22
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF LAND ANIMALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
FOSIL SPECIMENS OF PLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF INSECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
ONCE UPON A TIME THERE WAS DARWINISM . . . . . . . . . . . . . .450
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .452
DARWINISM'S CRUMBLING MYTHS ANDTHE CORRECT DEFINITION
OF SCIENCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 462
ONCE, LIFE WAS THOUGHT TO BE SIMPLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470
ONCE, THE FOSSIL RECORD WAS THOUGHT TO PROVE EVOLUTION . . . . .480
ONCE, THERE WAS A SEARCH FOR THE MISSING LINK . . . . . . . . . 490
ONCE, THERE WAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION . . . . .497
ONCE, IT WAS BELIEVED THAT THERE WAS
"EMBRYOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION" . . . . . . . . . . . 503
ONCE, THERE WAS THE MYTH OF FAULTY CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . .508
ONCE, THERE WAS THE MYTH OF "JUNK" DNA . . . . . . . . . . . . .516
ONCE, THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES WAS THOUGHT TO LIE IN "SPECIATION" .523
ONCE, THERE WAS THE "HORSE SERIES" SCENARIO . . . . . . . . . . 533
ONCE, THERE WAS THE STORY OF PEPPERED MOTHS . . . . . . . . . . 542
UNTIL RECENTLY, THERE WERE STORIES OF THE DINO-BIRD . . . . . . 549
CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .555
SOCIAL WEAPON: DARWINISM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .560
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .562
SOCIAL DARWINISM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .564
THE HISTORY OF RUTHLESSNESS, FROM MALTHUS TO DARWIN . . . . . . 573
THE "ROBBER BARONS," DARWIN'S FOLLOWERS . . . . . . . . . . . . 580
SOCIAL DARWINISM AND THE FAVORED RACES MYTH . . . . . . . . . . 589
THE RESULT OF THE DARWINISM-NAZISM COALITION: 40 MILLION DEAD . 619
SOCIAL DARWINISTS" STERILIZATION AND DEATH LAWS . . . . . . . . 632
A THEORY THAT BELITTLES WOMEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 654
DARWINISM AND MORAL COLLAPSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .660
THE "EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY" ERROR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 673
CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .683
THE OTHER NAME FOR ILLUSION: MATTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 688
FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .690
THE SECRET BEYOND MATTER IS NOT WAHDATUL WUJOOD . . . . . . . . 691
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .693
IT IS A SCIENTIFIC FACT THAT THE WORLD COMES INTO
EXISTENCE IN OUR BRAINS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .695
WHY IS THE TRUTH ABOUT MATTER SUCH AN IMPORTANT SUBJECT? . . . .747
TIME IS A PERCEPTION, TOO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 768
ETERNITY IS HIDDEN IN GOD'S MEMORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .783
REPLIES TO OBJECTIONS REGARDING THE REALITY OF MATTER . . . . . 794
CONCLUSION: THE TRUTH CANNOT BE AVOIDED . . . . . . . . . . . . 824
THOSE WHO LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT MATTER FEEL GREAT EXCITEMENT . .826
これらのうち、Vol.1 pp.44-609, Vol.2 68-479, Vol.3 pp.28-449 (合計1397頁)が化石を紹介するページである。全巻の半分以上のページを費やして、Harun YahraことAdnan Oktar(1956～)が何を言っているかというと...
「中間化石がない」＋「生きた化石」
Harun Yahyaは、使い古された陳腐な主張たる「中間化石がない」および「生きた化石＝何百万年も変化しない種がある」を大量美麗なページでひたするら主張を続ける。どのページも同じパターンなので、適当に開いたところで：
PERCH スズキ
Age: 54 to 37 million years old (5400万年前～3700万年前)
Location: Fossil Lake,Kemmerer, Wyoming (ワイオミング州ケミラー化石湖)
Formation: Green River Formation (グリーンリバー層)
Period: Eocene (始新世)
According to evolutionists' claims, the ancestors of fish were invertebrates, which lack backbones. However, evolutionists fail to answer how these ancestors with spines but no bones developed a backbone. That is because, these living beings should undergo such great changes that the hard shell surrounding their bodies should disappear while a skeleton appears inside. For such a transformation, there should be many intermediate links between the two organisms. However, evolutionists fail to show even a single fossil as an intermediate form between vertebrates and invertebrates.
進化論者の主張によれば、魚類の祖先は背骨のない無脊椎動物であるという。しかし、骨を持たない脊椎動物の祖先がどのようにして背骨を発達させたのかという問いに答えてはいない。なぜなら、これらの生物が大きな変化を迎える場合、体内に骨格が現れたときに体を包む殻は消えなくてはならないからだ。このような変態においては、2つの組織体の間に必ず過渡期の形が存在しなくてはならない。しかし、進化論者は脊椎動物と無脊椎動物の過渡期の存在を証明する化石は1つとして見つけていない。
On the other hand, millions of fossils show that fish always remained as fish, this 54- to 37-million-year-old perch fossil is one of them. (Vol.1 pp.108-109)
どれもこれも、化石の写真と現生種の写真を並べて同じ主張が繰り返される。
ということで、反論もストックされたものでＯＫ：
「中間化石がない」は今も使われる創造論者の主張で、インテリジェントデザインやAnswers in Genesisのような"若い地球の創造論"も同様。
ただし、違いもある。Harun Yahyaの主張とインテリジェントデザインの違いは「生きた化石」について。インテリジェントデザインはあくまでも進化論の隙間をデザインだと主張する"God of the gaps"論である。それに対して、Harun Yahyaは、あらゆる進化はないのだという「進化しない論」である。
Answers in Genesisも「進化しない論」だが、「Arguments we think creationists should NOT use（
創造論者が使ってはいけない論 ）」に「If we evolved from apes, why are there still apes today?（我々がサルから進化したのなら、
サルたちは何故今もサルのままなのか ）」を挙げている点で、少し違っている。
最終更新：2009年11月25日 02:22
